Benchmark insights

Fastest Intel CPU vs fastest AMD CPU we measured: AMD EPYC Turin ahead on 3 of 4 workloads

The fastest CPU of each vendor we measured, by the geometric mean of its throughput at the ranked size over the four workloads: Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) for Intel, AMD EPYC Turin for AMD. Both have AVX-512.

Throughput at the ranked size, 5 November 2026 round; higher is faster. Bars compare within each workload. CPUs in ochre, GPUs in blue; a second chip of the same kind is lighter.

The hardware

AMD EPYC Turin
CPU · 2024 · AMD EPYC 9005 (Turin), 2 sockets
Cores
2 × 96
Threads
192
Memory
375 GiB
Peak power (measured)
320 W per socket
Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids)
CPU · 2024 · Intel Xeon 6 P-core (Granite Rapids), 2 sockets
Cores
2 × 96
Threads
192
Memory
755 GiB
Power limit
600 W per socket

Results

WorkloadAMD EPYC TurinIntel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids)
Swaption portfolio, LMM
paths per second at 1,024K paths
44.0M/s41.1M/s
Barrier options, Monte Carlo
options per second at 16,000 options
1.04M/s991K/s
American options, binomial lattice
options per second at 512K options
4.94M/s4.35M/s
European options, Black-Scholes formula
options per second at 128M options
17.3B/s23.2B/s

Tuned code: tuned for each chip under the same rules. Every size, and every platform, is in the results; each platform name links to its measurement record.

AMD EPYC Turin is 1.07× faster than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) on the LMM swaption portfolio; AMD EPYC Turin is 1.05× faster than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) on barrier options (Monte Carlo); AMD EPYC Turin is 1.14× faster than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) on American options (binomial lattice); Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) is 1.3× faster than AMD EPYC Turin on European options (Black-Scholes formula).

Energy per result

The LMM swaption portfolio: AMD EPYC Turin uses 59% less energy per result than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids); Barrier options (Monte Carlo): AMD EPYC Turin uses 52% less energy per result than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids); American options (binomial lattice): AMD EPYC Turin uses 51% less energy per result than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids); European options (Black-Scholes formula): AMD EPYC Turin uses 30% less energy per result than Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids).

How these were measured

Each platform ran code tuned for that chip under the same rules, in double precision: five launches per measurement, the middle three averaged, warm calls in every launch until the 95% confidence interval of their mean was within ±1% or until the call limit. Any test spreading more than 5% is repeated on a second machine of the same type, and the steadier of the two is published. A Black-Scholes call makes 100 passes over the whole batch, each counted as work, so its options per second are options × 100 passes over the time of a call. At every problem size, the option price is validated against the reference implementation's before any time counts. The full method is on How we measure.

More benchmark insights

All benchmark insights Current results